MFF wins on most practical criteria: on-demand payout vs weekly, fixed 90% vs tiered 50-80% split, no consistency rule vs 30%. Both allow news trading without restriction. Earn2Trade makes sense if you specifically want its structured Gauntlet Mini evaluation program or its longer institutional track record.
Verified Comparison — August 5, 2026
vs
MyFundedFutures vs Earn2Trade 2026 — Which is Better?
MFF: $62.50, on-demand payout, no consistency rule, 90% fixed profit split, 5+ years of history. Earn2Trade: $114, 30% rule, news trading allowed, tiered 50-80% split. The operational gap is clear.
What are MyFundedFutures and Earn2Trade?
MyFundedFutures (MFF) and Earn2Trade are both futures prop firms with EOD drawdown, and MFF outperforms Earn2Trade on most other criteria. MFF pays on-demand at a fixed 90% split with no consistency rule. Earn2Trade has a longer institutional track record, also allows news trading and has no minimum days, but keeps the 30% consistency rule and pays a tiered split (50-80% depending on the withdrawal) instead of a fixed 90%.
The real gap is in the conditions: Earn2Trade's 30% consistency rule can disqualify active traders even when they meet the profit target. MFF removes that restriction entirely.
Who is this comparison for?
- Traders evaluating the real-world impact of a 30% consistency rule.
- Traders who prioritize on-demand payout over Earn2Trade's weekly cycle.
- Event traders (NFP, FOMC, CPI) who need unrestricted news access.
- Traders who want the best price at the most established firm in the futures sector.
Comparison table: MyFundedFutures vs Earn2Trade
| Feature | MyFundedFutures | Earn2Trade |
|---|---|---|
| 50K price (with discount) | $62.50 | $114 |
| Discount | 50% OFF · PROPSCOPE |
40% OFF · PROPSCOPE |
| Drawdown type | Fixed (EOD) ✓ | Fixed (EOD) ✓ |
| Consistency rule | None ✓ | 30% ✗ |
| Profit split | 90% fixed ✓ | 50-80% tiered |
| Payout frequency | On-demand ✓ | Weekly (Wednesdays) |
| Min trading days | None ✓ | None ✓ |
| News trading | Allowed ✓ | Allowed ✓ |
| Track record | 5+ yrs · 100K+ traders | Established |
50K account. Verified August 5, 2026.
MyFundedFutures — 50% OFF
50K from $62.50 · Code PROPSCOPE · On-demand payout · No consistency rule · 90% split
PROPSCOPE
Earn2Trade — 40% OFF
50K from $114 · Code PROPSCOPE · Fixed drawdown · Gauntlet program
PROPSCOPE
MyFundedFutures: the most established firm in futures prop trading
MyFundedFutures has over 5 years in the market with 100,000+ traders, on-demand payout, 90% profit split, no consistency rule, no minimum days and unrestricted news trading. With code PROPSCOPE the 50K account costs $62.50 (50% OFF).
The combination of industry-leading track record, strong operating conditions despite the slightly higher price makes MFF the default choice for most traders. The on-demand payout is especially impactful: withdraw profits the same day you generate them, with no waiting for fixed cycles.
MyFundedFutures evaluation rules (50K)
- Profit target: $3,000 (6%)
- Max drawdown: $2,000 fixed EOD
- Daily loss limit: $1,000
- Consistency rule: None
- Min trading days: None
- News trading: Allowed
- Profit split: 90%
- Payout: On-demand
Key advantage: On-demand payout + no consistency rule + fixed 90% split. A trader who generates $2,000 on a major economic event day can withdraw that same evening at 90% with MFF. With Earn2Trade, you'd wait for the weekly Wednesday payout and risk disqualification from the 30% consistency rule on that exact same day.
Earn2Trade: recognized track record with more operational restrictions
Earn2Trade is a long-established prop firm known for its structured "Gauntlet Mini" evaluation program. With code PROPSCOPE the 50K account costs $114 (40% OFF). It uses EOD drawdown like MFF and also allows news trading, but keeps two significant differences: a 30% consistency rule and a tiered profit split (50-80% depending on the withdrawal) instead of MFF's fixed 90%.
Earn2Trade's objective advantages over MFF are institutional longevity and the structured Gauntlet Mini framework. If those factors matter for your decision, Earn2Trade is a valid choice. On on-demand payout, consistency and fixed profit split, MFF is superior in 2026.
Earn2Trade evaluation rules (50K)
- Profit target: $3,000 (6%)
- Max drawdown: $2,000 EOD
- Daily loss limit: $1,100
- Consistency rule: 30% (no day > 30% of total profits)
- Min trading days: None
- News trading: Allowed, no extra restriction
- Profit split: Tiered — 50% below your account's withdrawal threshold, 80% once you hit or exceed it
- Payout: Request any day, processed once a week (Wednesdays)
Head-to-head comparison
Price
MFF wins on price: $62.50 vs $114. Earn2Trade costs more, but competes with its structured Gauntlet Mini program and longer institutional track record.
Consistency rule — the decisive factor
MFF wins: no restriction. Earn2Trade's 30% rule means no single day can represent more than 30% of total evaluation profits. Earn $1,500 in one session toward a $3,000 target — that day exceeds 30% and can disqualify your evaluation even if you've met the total. MFF imposes zero distribution restrictions on how you accumulate profits.
Profit split
MFF wins: a fixed 90% vs Earn2Trade's tiered 50-80%, where only withdrawals that hit your account's threshold pay the full 80% — smaller ones settle at 50%. On $2,000/month in gains, MFF always pays $1,800; with Earn2Trade your net can land anywhere from $1,000 to $1,600 depending on how you structure the withdrawal.
Payout frequency
MFF wins: on-demand vs Earn2Trade's weekly payout. With MFF you can request payment the same day you reach the withdrawal minimum. With Earn2Trade you can request a withdrawal any day, but it's only processed once a week, on Wednesdays.
News trading and minimum days
Tied on both: MFF and Earn2Trade both allow unrestricted news trading during NFP, FOMC and CPI. Minimum days are also a tie — Earn2Trade removed its old minimum-day requirement, so both firms now let you advance the moment you hit the target.
Institutional track record
MFF holds the edge: 5+ years with 100,000+ verified traders — the largest documented track record in the futures prop firm sector. Earn2Trade is also established, but MFF's volume of funded traders is unmatched. If institutional longevity is your criterion, MFF also wins here.
Pros and cons
MyFundedFutures
✓ Pros
- On-demand payout
- 90% profit split
- No consistency rule
- No minimum trading days
- Unrestricted news trading
- 5+ years · 100K+ traders
✗ Cons
- No structured Gauntlet-type program
Earn2Trade
✓ Pros
- Recognized institutional track record
- Structured Gauntlet Mini program
- Fixed EOD drawdown
- No minimum trading days
✗ Cons
- 30% consistency rule
- Tiered 50-80% profit split (vs fixed 90%)
- Weekly payout, not on-demand
Which is better depending on your trading style?
Traders who want the best price with the best conditions
MyFundedFutures. $62.50 with on-demand payout, 90% split and zero restrictions. Objectively the best price-to-conditions ratio in this comparison.
Traders who concentrate gains in few sessions
MyFundedFutures. Earn2Trade's 30% consistency rule can disqualify you even when you hit the profit target; MFF imposes no such restriction. On news trading both firms are tied — both allow trading NFP, FOMC and CPI without extra restriction.
Traders who want on-demand payout
MyFundedFutures. Earn2Trade pays weekly, on Wednesdays. MFF lets you withdraw profits at any time. For traders who want to reinvest or access capital flexibly, MFF is the only option of the two.
Newer traders who value the structured Gauntlet framework
Earn2Trade. For traders who prefer a structured, rules-defined evaluation program (The Gauntlet Mini), Earn2Trade offers a more formal framework. It is the only objective reason to choose Earn2Trade over MFF.
Verdict: MyFundedFutures or Earn2Trade?
MyFundedFutures wins on most operational criteria: on-demand payout, a fixed 90% profit split and no consistency rule (neither firm requires minimum days anymore, and both allow news trading). Earn2Trade counters with its structured Gauntlet Mini program and longer institutional track record, but MFF also holds the larger verified track record with 100,000+ funded traders.
Earn2Trade makes sense only if you specifically want the structured Gauntlet Mini evaluation program. On every other dimension, MFF is the superior choice in 2026.
Overall winner: MyFundedFutures
$62.50, on-demand payout, 90% profit split, no consistency rule, news trading free. The best futures prop firm in 2026.
Get MFF Discount →Code PROPSCOPE · 50% OFF → $62.50
If you want the Gauntlet program: Earn2Trade
Structured "Gauntlet Mini" evaluation with lower final price and recognized institutional history.
Get Earn2Trade Discount →PROPSCOPE
Code PROPSCOPE · 40% OFF → $114
FAQ: MyFundedFutures vs Earn2Trade
MFF: $62.50 with code PROPSCOPE. Earn2Trade: $114 with the same code. MFF is cheaper and also competes on on-demand payout, a fixed split and no consistency rule.
Yes. MyFundedFutures lets you request payment at any time — no fixed cycles. Earn2Trade also accepts requests any day, but only processes payouts once a week, on Wednesdays. For traders who want immediate access to their profits, MFF is the only option of the two.
No single trading day can represent more than 30% of total evaluation profits. Earn $1,500 in one day toward a $3,000 target — that day hits 50% and can disqualify your evaluation even if you've reached the total. MFF has no such restriction.
MFF pays a fixed 90% profit split, on-demand. Earn2Trade pays a tiered split (50-80% depending on the withdrawal) on a weekly cycle. On $2,000/month in profits, MFF always pays $1,800; with Earn2Trade the net ranges from $1,000 to $1,600 depending on withdrawal size.
Yes. MFF allows trading during NFP, FOMC, CPI and any high-impact economic event without restriction. Earn2Trade also allows it, with no extra restriction. Both firms are tied on this criterion.
Yes. Both MFF and Earn2Trade use fixed EOD drawdown. The loss floor stays constant regardless of profits — one of the few dimensions where both firms are equal, and both outperform trailing drawdown alternatives.
Only if you specifically want the structured Gauntlet Mini evaluation framework or its longer institutional track record. On payout, profit split and consistency, MFF is superior in 2026.